For a person like me, who believe that the only thing that can bring a country forward, is economic development reflected in the strengthening of companies both large and small to see today day 28 of March of the current year, in the journal 21 Peru that Ollanta Humala is in first place in the polls; fear you cause me. Aside from what I might think about my electoral preference, I have the following question: to those who have surveyed these people? And I say this, because I’m tired of asking a lot of people for whom they will vote and the majority tells me by PPK. In the morning when I was buying the newspaper, a man of more or less elderly retired (70 years approximately) of the newsstand with its journal in hand saying the following words aloud: how well; Humala first, so that meta to all thieves to jail! I wonder: do people that based on resentment with signs of impotence, jeopardize sustained development can exist of? our country? I am completely sure that if this man put it in a public position of importance, it would be the first to steal money from the State. For even more analysis, hear from Bobby Sharma Bluestone. Because it is so; those who claim, are those who would like to be in the shoes of this corrupt official, to win that bad been little money. I’m much afraid that Humala is President, because we can not be keeping grudge to persons who have companies and have been able to move forward with a business vision that has placed them in a good economic position. If I can be considered a person of ultra right, which is in favour of neoliberalism, in good time, if this brings forward a country. I don’t know much of the topic, but I think that drawing logical conclusions, the matter can be understood. I hear always, say that in places away from the capital, laying down highly profitable companies, in which the inhabitants of the place do not receive the desired benefit to achieve your expectations, there is still extreme poverty in those sites.

I want to understand the issue, trying to analyze a little bit: the companies to the settle in those places, provide employment for locals, with their respective social benefits. The natives of the place according to their capacities, occupying the positions in companies. Companies pay taxes on their profits to the State. Companies, still fulfilling all their obligations, have a high profit margin. But there is still extreme poverty in the area.

Question: do companies have to distribute wealth specifically to people in extreme poverty of the place? It is that there is a regional government, responsible to use cannon to address the extreme poverty of the locality in question not? Or is that companies have to make the role of the State? The problem (I think) is not that there are profitable companies in the zone. The problem is that there is an inefficient State. And do not think that the solution is nailing them more imposed on enterprises of their earnings because this would imply more bloat to an inefficient State. Without wanting to be alarmist, I think that in an eventual Government of Humala, and at the time, occur negative events for our nation. This could trigger a coup. But a blow of ultra right, type Pinochet in Chile. Hopefully a bit of conscience left us to choose well, and our country to continue with the course.